Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed16 July 20266005866

11 Maygoods View, High Road, Uxbridge, UB8 2HG

Planning appeal 6005866 at 11 Maygoods View, High Road, Uxbridge, UB8 2HG (London Borough of Hillingdon) was dismissed on 16 July 2026 by Inspector Timothy Parton, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal in meeting local housing need.

change of use from Class C3 to Class C4 HMO for 6 persons

Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Inspector
Timothy Parton
Postcode
UB8 2HG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal in meeting local housing need
  • the effect of the proposal on the character of the area and the living conditions of nearby residents, with particular regard to noise and disturbance
  • the effect of the living accommodation on the living conditions of future occupants of the proposed dwelling, with particular regard to internal and private external space
  • whether the proposal would make adequate provision for parking

What decided it

The cumulative weight of harms relating to loss of self-contained housing stock, adverse effects on neighbouring amenity and area character through noise and disturbance, inadequate internal living conditions for future occupiers due to the unauthorised rear extension, and failure to provide adequate parking in a poorly accessible location outweighed any compliance with other aspects of the development plan.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DMH 1Policy DMH 5Policy DMHB 11Policy DMHB 16Policy DMHB 18Policy DMT 1Policy DMT 2Policy DMT 5Policy DMT 6Policy D3Policy D6Policy D13Policy T4Policy T5Policy T6
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 135Paragraph 116

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

236 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hillingdon

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266009856
    18-20 Wilmar Close, Hayes, UB4 8ET
  2. Dismissed18 September 20266011516
    73 High Street, Ruislip, HA4 8JB
  3. Dismissed15 September 20266010520
    Grove Farm, Rickmansworth Road, Harefield, UB9 6JY
  4. Dismissed7 August 20266005469
    10 Lawn Avenue, West Drayton, UB7 7AQ
  5. Dismissed23 July 20266008246
    21 Green Lane, Hillingdon, Uxbridge, UB8 3ED

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.