Planning appeal decision
96 Oakdene Road, Hillingdon, UB10 0SQ
Planning appeal 6002695 at 96 Oakdene Road, Hillingdon, UB10 0SQ (London Borough of Hillingdon) was dismissed on 12 June 2026 by Inspector S F Barnes, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed roof extension and rear dormer window on the character and appearance of the area.
conversion of roofspace to habitable use to include a hip to gable roof extension, rear dormer and 3 front rooflights, single storey rear extension and change of use to 5bedroom 5person HMO. (Part retrospective)
- Authority
- London Borough of Hillingdon
- Appeal type
- Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- S F Barnes
- Postcode
- UB10 0SQ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed roof extension and rear dormer window on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposed use as a House in Multiple Occupation (HMO) on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with particular regard to noise and disturbance
- the effect of the proposal on vehicle and cycle parking
What decided it
The significant and demonstrable harms to the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers through noise and disturbance, and to on-street parking availability, arising from the HMO use outweigh the limited benefits of the proposal when assessed against the Framework as a whole.
The limited benefits of housing delivery and sustainable transport encouragement were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the significant harms to neighbouring living conditions and on-street parking availability, with the character and appearance harm overcome by the fallback position; the balance tipped decisively against the proposal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DMHB 11Policy DMHB 12Policy DMHD 1Policy DMH 5Policy DMHB 16Policy DMT 6Policy DMT 1Policy DMT 2Policy BE1Policy D1Policy D3Policy D4Policy T2Policy T4
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Hillingdon
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed27 October 2026600985618-20 Wilmar Close, Hayes, UB4 8ET
- Dismissed18 September 2026601151673 High Street, Ruislip, HA4 8JB
- Dismissed15 September 20266010520Grove Farm, Rickmansworth Road, Harefield, UB9 6JY
- Dismissed7 August 2026600546910 Lawn Avenue, West Drayton, UB7 7AQ
- Dismissed23 July 2026600824621 Green Lane, Hillingdon, Uxbridge, UB8 3ED
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®