Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 September 20213269248

38 Parker Street, North Woolwich, London, E16 2DJ

Planning appeal 3269248 at 38 Parker Street, North Woolwich, London, E16 2DJ (London Borough of Newham) was dismissed on 9 September 2021 by Inspector Douglas L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would provide satisfactory living conditions for future residents, with particular regard to private internal and outside space.

Erection of two storey side extension to serve two new 1 bedroom flats

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Douglas L
Postcode
E16 2DJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would provide satisfactory living conditions for future residents, with particular regard to private internal and outside space

What decided it

The proposed flats would fail to provide sufficient internal space and the first floor flat would lack access to private outside space, resulting in unacceptable living conditions for future occupants contrary to the development plan.

The modest benefits of enhanced dwelling type choice and social and economic benefits from providing two one-bedroom flats would not outweigh the harm to future occupiers from inadequate living conditions.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D6 of the London PlanPolicy GG4 of the London PlanPolicy D3 of the London PlanPolicy S1 of the Council's Local PlanPolicy SP1 of the Council's Local PlanPolicy SP2 of the Council's Local PlanPolicy H1 of the Council's Local Plan

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

135 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Newham

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed26 October 20266010788
    Costa Coffee, 45 Woodgrange Road, Forest Gate, E7 8BA
  2. Allowed22 October 20266012761
    Land Outside 341 to 353, High Street, Stratford, E15 4QZ
  3. Dismissed21 October 20266014267
    Rear Of 90 Cumberland Road, Plaistow, London, E13 8LQ
  4. Dismissed2 October 20266011081
    239 Barking Road, London, E6 1LB
  5. Allowed18 September 20266011432
    7 Grayling Close, Canning Town, London, E16 4PB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.