Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed1 July 20213269266

Hey Field Farm, Garswood Old Road, Ashton in Makerfield, WN4 0XR

Planning appeal 3269266 at Hey Field Farm, Garswood Old Road, Ashton in Makerfield, WN4 0XR (St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 1 July 2021 by Inspector Taylor K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies.

change of use of agricultural land to equestrian use. Erection of stable block for 6 horses with tack and feed rooms. Construction of all weather riding surface. Stationing of residential caravan (14.5 x 6 metres)

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
agricultural · Minor offices/R&D/light industry
Inspector
Taylor K
Postcode
WN4 0XR

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • The effect on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect on the living conditions of future occupiers, with particular regard to noise, disturbance and wellbeing
  • The effect on biodiversity
  • The effect on the safety, integrity and operational needs of the railway
  • The effect on land stability, with particular regard to historic coal mining activities
  • If the development is inappropriate in the Green Belt, would the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would significantly harm openness and fail to preserve the essential characteristics of the Green Belt, and the other considerations advanced do not clearly outweigh this harm or the additional harm to living conditions, character and appearance, and biodiversity.

The benefits of mental health therapy and wellbeing for young people (attributed substantial weight) and limited economic benefits did not outweigh the harm to Green Belt openness and purposes, harm to character and appearance, harm to living conditions of future occupiers, and insufficient evidence to rule out harm to biodiversity.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy GB1Policy GB2Policy CP1Policy CQL2Policy CQL4Policy CQL3
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 145Paragraph 143Paragraph 146Paragraph 133Paragraph 134Paragraph 175

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

9 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed29 April 20266002435
    3 Catchdale, Moss Lane, St Helens, WA10 5QG
  2. Notice upheld23 March 20263343768
    383 - 385 West End Road, Haydock, St Helens, WA11 0AX
  3. Dismissed22 August 20253365925
    Rear of 99-101 Greenfield Road, Dentons Green, St Helens , Merseyside , WA10 6SH
  4. Allowed6 August 20253363687
    Land South of 33 Mill Lane, Bold Heath , St Helens , WA8 3UU
  5. Dismissed27 May 20253356966
    1 Maggotts Nook Road, Rainford, Merseyside, WA11 8PJ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.