Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 August 20213269275

16 Palm Avenue, Sidcup, KENT, DA14 5JG

a two-storey side extension and loft conversion

Authority
London Borough of Bexley
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Reed D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The rear-facing box dormer would significantly harm the character and appearance of the terrace by creating the appearance of an extra storey and unduly affecting the existing hipped roof design, contrary to development plan requirements for subordinate extensions.

The substantial additional living accommodation provided by the proposal did not outweigh the significant harm to the character and appearance of the area and conflict with the development plan.

Plan policies cited: Policy CS06 of the Bexley Core Strategy 2012, Policy EN39 of the Bexley Unitary Development Plan 2004, Policy H9 of the Bexley Unitary Development Plan 2004, Design and Development Control Guideline 2 of the Bexley Unitary Development Plan 2004

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.