Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 September 20213269310

653 - 659 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End, Pinner, HA5 3LW

Planning appeal 3269310 at 653 - 659 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End, Pinner, HA5 3LW (London Borough of Harrow) was dismissed on 17 September 2021 by Inspector McDonagh C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of varying the condition would have on the living conditions of future occupiers of the properties and on the character and appearance of the appeal site and local area.

Redevelopment to provide part three and four storey building to accommodate 26 flats; 26 surface parking spaces; Cycle and bin stores; 2 x vehicle crossovers without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref P/1234/18, dated 27 June 2019

Authority
London Borough of Harrow
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
McDonagh C
Postcode
HA5 3LW

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of varying the condition would have on the living conditions of future occupiers of the properties and on the character and appearance of the appeal site and local area

What decided it

The proposed encroachment of parking spaces into communal open space would significantly reduce the quality and form of the communal green space, harming the living conditions of future occupiers and the character and appearance of the site and local area.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM1 of the Harrow Council Development Management Policies (July 2013)Policy CS1 of the Harrow Core Strategy (February 2012)Policy D5 of the London PlanPolicy D6 of the London PlanPolicy D1 of the London PlanPolicy G5 of the London Plan
Judgments
Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE [JPL 1982 P37]

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

362 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Harrow

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266006380
    Thrale Farm, 1 Oxhey Lane, Pinner, HA3 6SX
  2. Dismissed22 October 20266013962
    2 Whitefriars Avenue,, Harrow Weald, HA3 5RN
  3. Dismissed19 October 20266011336
    52 Durley Avenue, Pinner, HA5 1JH
  4. Dismissed16 October 20266011223
    30 Kenmore Avenue, Kenton, HA3 8PQ
  5. Dismissed16 October 20266008284
    24 Uxbridge Road, Stanmore, Harrow, HA7 3LG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.