Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed16 June 20213269315

635 Uxbridge Road, Hayes, UB4 8HS

Planning appeal 3269315 at 635 Uxbridge Road, Hayes, UB4 8HS (London Borough of Hillingdon) was dismissed on 16 June 2021 by Inspector Indermaur S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the first floor extension on the character and appearance of the area.

a first floor rear extension, conversion of garage/garden store into garden room and installation of vehicular crossover to front

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Indermaur S
Postcode
UB4 8HS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the first floor extension on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the first floor extension on the living conditions of the occupiers of 367 Uxbridge Road with regard to light and visual effect
  • the effect on the living conditions of the occupiers of the host dwelling with regard to whether adequate external amenity space would be retained
  • whether the alterations to the garage and store would accord with the development plan policy for outbuildings

What decided it

The substantial harm to character and appearance, neighbouring living conditions, host dwelling amenity space, and breach of outbuilding policy collectively outweighed the moderate weight of personal benefits.

the moderate weight of personal benefits did not outweigh the substantial harm to character and appearance, neighbouring living conditions, and policy compliance

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DMHD 1Policy DMHB 11Policy DMHB 12Policy BE1Policy DMHD 2

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

422 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hillingdon

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266015310
    4 Albany Close, Ickenham, UB10 8QW
  2. Dismissed27 October 20266009856
    18-20 Wilmar Close, Hayes, UB4 8ET
  3. Dismissed21 October 20266011782
    25 Stirling Road, Hayes, UB3 3AH
  4. Dismissed19 October 20266011268
    364 Victoria Road, Ruislip, HA4 0ET
  5. Allowed6 October 20266013858
    88 Stormount Drive, Hayes, UB3 1RH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.