Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed19 October 20266011268

364 Victoria Road, Ruislip, HA4 0ET

Planning appeal 6011268 at 364 Victoria Road, Ruislip, HA4 0ET (London Borough of Hillingdon) was dismissed on 19 October 2026, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on highway and pedestrian safety.

the installation of a dropped kerb

Appeal type
householder · Householder
Procedure
Written
Development
other
Postcode
HA4 0ET

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on highway and pedestrian safety
  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the local area

What decided it

The unacceptable risks to highway and pedestrian safety arising from the requirement to reverse manoeuvres onto a busy classified road with a well-used footway substantially outweighed the accessibility benefits to the occupiers.

The significant weight attached to accessibility benefits for the occupiers was substantially outweighed by the unacceptable risks to highway and pedestrian safety

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy T4 of The London PlanPolicy DMT 1 of the Hillingdon Local Plan Part 2: Development Management PoliciesPolicy DMT 2 of the Hillingdon Local Plan Part 2: Development Management PoliciesPolicy BE1 of the Hillingdon Local Plan: Part One Strategic PoliciesPolicy DMHB 11 of the Hillingdon Local Plan Part 2Policy DMHB 12 of the Hillingdon Local Plan Part 2

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

298 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hillingdon

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266015310
    4 Albany Close, Ickenham, UB10 8QW
  2. Dismissed27 October 20266009856
    18-20 Wilmar Close, Hayes, UB4 8ET
  3. Dismissed21 October 20266011782
    25 Stirling Road, Hayes, UB3 3AH
  4. Allowed6 October 20266013858
    88 Stormount Drive, Hayes, UB3 1RH
  5. Allowed30 September 20266013846
    73 Mulberry Crescent, West Drayton, UB7 9AQ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.