Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed30 September 20266013846

73 Mulberry Crescent, West Drayton, UB7 9AQ

Planning appeal 6013846 at 73 Mulberry Crescent, West Drayton, UB7 9AQ (London Borough of Hillingdon) was allowed on 30 September 2026, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the residential amenities of neighbours (whether unacceptable harm would be caused by loss of light and outlook).

described in the application form as follows: “Erection of single storey rear extension, following the demolition of conservatory to dwellinghouse

Authority
London Borough of Hillingdon
Appeal type
householder · Householder
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Postcode
UB7 9AQ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the residential amenities of neighbours (whether unacceptable harm would be caused by loss of light and outlook)
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host building and its surroundings

What decided it

The extension would not cause unacceptable loss of light or outlook for immediate neighbours, nor unacceptable harm to character and appearance, and thus was acceptable in planning terms.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
The London Plan Policy D3The London Plan Policy D6Policy DMHD 11Policy DMHD 12Policy DMHD 1

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

288 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hillingdon

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266015310
    4 Albany Close, Ickenham, UB10 8QW
  2. Dismissed27 October 20266009856
    18-20 Wilmar Close, Hayes, UB4 8ET
  3. Dismissed21 October 20266011782
    25 Stirling Road, Hayes, UB3 3AH
  4. Dismissed19 October 20266011268
    364 Victoria Road, Ruislip, HA4 0ET
  5. Allowed6 October 20266013858
    88 Stormount Drive, Hayes, UB3 1RH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.