Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed23 May 20223269562

Land at Tyntesfield Springs, Bristol Road, Wraxall, North Somerset, BS48 1NE

Planning appeal 3269562 at Land at Tyntesfield Springs, Bristol Road, Wraxall, North Somerset, BS48 1NE (North Somerset Council) was dismissed on 23 May 2022 by Inspector Sabu R, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework (Framework) and any relevant development plan policies.

removal of existing barn and erection of new dwelling and associated works, including new horizontal vortex turbine, use of existing lake to provide a heat source and new tree planting

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Other Major Developments
Inspector
Sabu R
Postcode
BS48 1NE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework (Framework) and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposed development on the openness and purposes of including land within the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the proposal would meet the policy exception for new dwellings in the countryside as set out in paragraph 80 of the Framework
  • whether the proposed development would accord with the Council's development plan strategy and the Framework with regard to the location of housing
  • would the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The cumulative harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, together with harm to openness and to the character and appearance of the area, was not clearly outweighed by other considerations, so very special circumstances did not exist.

The substantial harm to the Green Belt and significant harm to character/appearance, location policy and environmental accessibility were not clearly outweighed by the modest weight given to biodiversity/turbine benefits and the value of the Wright-designed architecture, so the balance tipped against the proposal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM12Policy CS5Policy CS12Policy DM10Policy DM32Policy CS33
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 8Paragraph 80Paragraph 137Paragraph 148Paragraph 149Paragraph 150

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

12 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in North Somerset Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed9 October 20266011867
    Fairoaks, Cadbury Camp Lane, Clapton-in-Gordano, BS20 7SA
  2. Dismissed6 August 20266007743
    Former BT Radio Research Laboratory, Long Lane, Backwell, BS48 3DE
  3. Dismissed8 June 20266006387
    Pump House, Land off Kingston Lane, Winford, Bristol, BS40 8DA
  4. Dismissed11 November 20253366314
    Land to Southeast of Wood Lane, Clapton in Gordano, BS20 7RQ
  5. Dismissed26 September 20253365815
    Land to South of Orchard Lee, 7 Backwell Hill Road, Backwell, BS48 3PL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.