Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 October 20213269587

98 Felbrigge Road, Ilford, Essex, IG3 9XJ

Planning appeal 3269587 at 98 Felbrigge Road, Ilford, Essex, IG3 9XJ (London Borough of Redbridge) was dismissed on 12 October 2021 by Inspector Savage K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the development is suitably located and provides an appropriate mix of housing, in particular with respect to the loss of a larger family-sized dwelling.

change of use from a single dwelling house to a house of multiple occupation of more than 6 occupants

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Savage K
Postcode
IG3 9XJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the development is suitably located and provides an appropriate mix of housing, in particular with respect to the loss of a larger family-sized dwelling
  • the effect on the character of the area and on the living conditions of neighbouring residents
  • whether the development provides satisfactory living conditions for occupants

What decided it

The combination of material harm to neighbouring living conditions and the failure to provide a satisfactory standard of accommodation for HMO occupants, in conflict with the development plan, outweighed the limited social and economic benefits of the proposal.

The social benefit of providing lower-cost accommodation for more occupants in an accessible location was outweighed by the material harm to neighbouring living conditions, the failure to meet housing design standards, and the overall conflict with the development plan.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy LP5Policy LP6Policy LP26Policy LP29

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

484 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Redbridge

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Notice varied and upheld23 September 20263353209
    3 Highbury Gardens, Ilford, IG3 8AB
  2. Dismissed21 May 20266004591
    18 Leyswood Drive, Newbury Park, Ilford, IG2 7JE
  3. Allowed6 May 20266005192
    38 Hertford Road, Ilford, IG2 7HF
  4. Dismissed6 May 20266000914
    12 Cavendish Gardens, Ilford, IG1 3EA
  5. Dismissed28 April 20266004411
    178, The Drive, Cranbrook, Ilford, IG1 3PP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.