Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 October 20213269612

2-4 Copse Hill and 52-54 Brighton Road, Sutton, London, SM2 6AD

Planning appeal 3269612 at 2-4 Copse Hill and 52-54 Brighton Road, Sutton, London, SM2 6AD (London Borough of Sutton) was dismissed on 13 October 2021 by Inspector Wilde J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

the redevelopment of 2-4 Copse Hill and 52-54 Brighton Road to provide part four, part six and part seven storey height building comprising 55 studio, one and two bed flats with access from Copse Hill, associated car parking and landscaping

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Wilde J
Postcode
SM2 6AD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether or not there would be sufficient outdoor amenity and play space of a suitable standard
  • Whether or not the mix of units would be in accordance with the requirements of the local development plan
  • The effect of the proposed development on flooding

What decided it

The proposed development conflicts with the development plan in respect of character and appearance, outdoor amenity space provision, and housing mix, and these conflicts are not outweighed by the benefit of 55 new dwellings.

The benefit of 55 new dwellings does not outweigh the conflict with the development plan in respect of character and appearance, outdoor amenity space provision, and housing mix

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 28cPolicy 9b(ii)Policy 9Policy 10Policy SI 13 of the London Plan 2021

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

272 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Sutton

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed19 October 20266002198
    103 Marlow Drive, North Cheam, SM3 9BD
  2. Allowed25 June 20263371477
    79-85 Beddington Lane, Beddington , Sutton, CR0 4TH
  3. Dismissed18 September 20253365663
    Land to Rear of 81 Kingsmead Avenue, Worcester Park, London, KT4 8UZ
  4. Dismissed14 August 20253364800
    60 Waverley Avenue, Sutton, SM1 3JY
  5. Allowed28 April 20253353135
    231 Woodcote Road, Purley, CR8 3PB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.