Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed8 September 20213270168

20 Canterbury Avenue, Sidcup, KENT, DA15 9AS

the construction of a hip to gable roof extension, with dormer in rear roof slope and insertion of 2 rooflights in the front roof slope

Authority
London Borough of Bexley
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Jarvis P

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect on the character and appearance of the host property and wider street scene

What decided it

The proposed roof additions would be harmful to the character and appearance of the host dwelling and wider street scene, conflicting with local design policies and the Framework's requirements for high quality, visually attractive development sympathetic to local character.

The benefits of enhanced family accommodation were outweighed by the harm to the character and appearance of the host property and wider street scene.

Framework references: 126, 130

Plan policies cited: Policy CS01 of the London Borough of Bexley Core Strategy (2012), Policy H9 of the Bexley Unitary Development Plan (2004), Policy ENV39 of the Bexley Unitary Development Plan (2004), Design and Development Control Guideline 2 (DCG2)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.