Planning appeal decision
Former Royal Oak Public House, 73 Main Street, Hornby , Lancaster, Lancashire, LA2 8JY
Planning appeal 3270187 at Former Royal Oak Public House, 73 Main Street, Hornby , Lancaster, Lancashire, LA2 8JY (Lancaster City Council) was dismissed on 3 May 2022 by Inspector Tweddle J, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development would be in a suitable location with regard to flood risk.
the relevant demolition of detached barn and single and two storey rear projections, change of use of public house (A4) into two dwellings (C3), erection of a two storey rear extension, erection of a detached garage block and the erection of three dwellings (C3) with associated access
- Authority
- Lancaster City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Tweddle J
- Postcode
- LA2 8JY
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the development would be in a suitable location with regard to flood risk
- Whether a contribution should be made towards the delivery of affordable housing
- Whether the proposal would provide suitable parking provision
- Whether the proposal would preserve the Grade II listed building, its setting and any features of special interest that it possesses
- Whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Hornby Conservation Area
- Whether the proposal would constitute enabling development with regard to the restoration and conservation of the Grade II listed building and, if so, whether the conservation benefits would be sufficient to outweigh the disbenefits of any identified conflicts with planning policy
What decided it
The combined and unresolved harm to the flood risk sequential test outcome and to the significance of the listed building and conservation area, without a robust case for enabling development, outweighed the public benefits of the scheme.
the public benefits, including housing delivery and securing a use for the listed building, did not outweigh the great weight placed on the less than substantial harm to the listed building and conservation area, together with unresolved conflicts on flood risk, affordable housing and parking/highway safety
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- DM33DM3DM6DM62DM37DM38DM39DM29DM56
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 162Paragraph 201Paragraph 202Paragraph 208Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Lancaster City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Allowed25 August 2026600680560 Marine Road West, Morecambe, LA4 4ET
- Quashed On Legal Grounds29 September 2025335408028 Dallas Road, Lancaster, LA1 1TW
- Allowed11 August 202533637575 Dalton Road, Lancaster, LA1 3HD
- Dismissed4 June 202533600802 Allandale Gardens, Lancaster, LA1 5JN
- Allowed14 March 20253350855Land West of Sea View Drive, Hest Bank, Lancaster, LA2 6BZ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®