Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed14 March 20253350855

Land West of Sea View Drive, Hest Bank, Lancaster, LA2 6BZ

Planning appeal 3350855 at Land West of Sea View Drive, Hest Bank, Lancaster, LA2 6BZ (Lancaster City Council) was allowed on 14 March 2025 by Inspector McCormack A, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the NPPF and relevant development plan policies.

erection of 27 no. specialist bungalows for older people with detached garage and associated access, internal roads, infrastructure, open space, landscaping and parking

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
McCormack A
Postcode
LA2 6BZ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the NPPF and relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the landscape and the surrounding area, including the setting of the Lancaster Canal at Hest Bank
  • The effect of the proposal on highway safety with particular regard to highway layout and design, the potential conflict between users and the provision of appropriate connectivity to the Lancaster Canal towpath
  • Whether the proposal would be at risk of surface and ground water flooding and whether a sequential test to demonstrate that the proposal cannot be located in an area at a lower risk of flooding is required. If required, whether the scope of a sequential test should extend beyond the Bolton and Slyne ward boundary
  • The weight to be accorded to the proposal's contribution to meeting identified older persons housing needs

What decided it

The finding that the site was Grey Belt land and not inappropriate development in the Green Belt, combined with the NPPF11d(ii) tilted balance concluding that the limited harms identified did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the substantial housing and other benefits.

The limited harms identified to landscape character, highway safety and flood risk did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the significant and substantial benefits of the proposal, including meeting identified older persons' housing need, addressing the housing land supply shortfall and above-policy affordable housing provision, so the balance under NPPF11d(ii) favoured granting permission.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SP2Policy EN4Policy DM50Policy HE1Policy T3Policy DM29Policy DM46Policy DM8Policy DM57Policy DM60Policy DM61Policy DM62Policy DM32Policy DM33Policy DM34Policy DM44Policy DM45Policy DM28Policy DM30aPolicy DM30bPolicy DM30(c)Policy SP8
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 57Paragraph 63Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 135Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 155Paragraph 156Paragraph 157Paragraph 158Paragraph 159Paragraph 174Paragraph 175Paragraph 181Paragraph 182Paragraph 187
Judgments
Visao Ltd; Mead Realisations

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

5 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Lancaster City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266012921
    Land Off Deer Park Lane, Hornby, Lancaster, LA2 8LF
  2. Notice varied and upheld23 September 20263378663
    Land Lying to the North of Bottomdale Road, Halton, Lancashire, LA2 6BH
  3. Allowed25 August 20266006805
    60 Marine Road West, Morecambe, LA4 4ET
  4. Dismissed14 August 20266007131
    Angel's Field, Swarthdale, Birkland Barrow Road, Nether Kellet, LA6 1FJ
  5. Allowed12 August 20266007210
    Land at Arna Wood Lane, Aldcliffe, LA2 0AE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.