Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 November 20213270198

64 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London, WC2A 3JX

Planning appeal 3270198 at 64 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London, WC2A 3JX (London Borough of Camden) was dismissed on 4 November 2021 by Inspector Edginton A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposals would preserve the Grade II listed 64 Lincoln's Inn Fields, or any features of special architectural and historic interest, including setting, and whether the proposals would preserve the settings of the Grade I listed Lindsey House, the Grade II* Listed Powis House, 57–58 and 65 Lincolns Inn, and the Parks and Gardens Grade II listed Lincoln's Inn Fields; and, whether the works would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Bloomsbury Conservation Area.

Full planning permission and listed building consent to raise the existing rear extension, to lower the third-floor ceiling level and for the erection of a single storey double pitch mansard roof extension along with alterations to the front façade to facilitate the creation of a two bedroom apartment and associated plant

Appeal type
other · Listed Building Consent & Conservation Area Consent Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Edginton A
Postcode
WC2A 3JX

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposals would preserve the Grade II listed 64 Lincoln's Inn Fields, or any features of special architectural and historic interest, including setting, and whether the proposals would preserve the settings of the Grade I listed Lindsey House, the Grade II* Listed Powis House, 57–58 and 65 Lincolns Inn, and the Parks and Gardens Grade II listed Lincoln's Inn Fields; and, whether the works would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Bloomsbury Conservation Area
  • The effect of the development on parking stress and highway safety
  • Whether the development would accord with local policies regarding affordable housing

What decided it

The substantial harm to the significance of 64 Lincoln's Inn Fields through loss of historic fabric and the creation of a contrived and incongruous mansard roof extension could not be justified by the modest addition of one residential unit.

The modest provision of one additional residential unit and a small affordable housing contribution did not outweigh the substantial harm to the Grade II listed building and less than substantial harm to the settings of other listed buildings and the conservation area.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D1Policy D2Policy T2Policy H4Policy DM1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 201Paragraph 202Paragraph 16

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 851 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Camden

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed29 September 20266008940
    Basement Flat, 226 Finchley Road, London, NW3 6DH
  2. Dismissed8 September 20266009503
    Leapman House, 59 Primrose Gardens, London, NW3 4UL
  3. Allowed15 July 20266005997
    12 Sarre Road, London, NW2 3SL
  4. Notice upheld22 June 20263370592
    Third Floor Flat, 18 Stukeley Street, London, London, WC2B 5LR
  5. Notice upheld22 June 20263370591
    Land at: Fourth-Fifth Floor Duplexes, 18 Stukeley Street, London, WC2B 5LR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.