Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed28 January 20223270321

Land at Cragdale Gardens, Hetton-le-Hole, Houghton-le-Spring, DH5 0DW

Planning appeal 3270321 at Land at Cragdale Gardens, Hetton-le-Hole, Houghton-le-Spring, DH5 0DW (Sunderland City Council) was allowed on 28 January 2022 by Inspector Cross D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the provision of greenspace, with due regard to outdoor sport and recreation provision.

erection of 86 no. residential dwellings (Class C3)

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Cross D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the provision of greenspace, with due regard to outdoor sport and recreation provision
  • Other considerations relevant to the planning balance

What decided it

The substantial contribution to affordable housing provision, addressing a significant shortfall identified in the Council's Strategic Housing Market Assessment, outweighed the limited weight given to the conflict with the development plan.

The limited weight given to the conflict with policy HA11 of the UDP was balanced against the significant weight given to the contribution to affordable housing supply and limited weight given to other benefits; material considerations indicated the proposal should be determined otherwise than in accordance with the development plan.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy NE4 of the Core Strategy and Development Plan 2020Policy NE4-3(ii)Policy NE4-4(iii)Policy HA25 of the Unitary Development Plan 1998Policy HA11 of the Unitary Development Plan 1998Policy HA28 of the Unitary Development Plan 1998
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 57

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

21 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Sunderland

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Allowed25 September 20266004934
    105 Wellburn Road, Washington, NE37 1DD
  2. Dismissed14 September 20266011401
    1 Rothbury, Sunderland, SR2 0BE
  3. Dismissed9 July 20266006595
    Filebase Limited, Filebase House, 3A Stephenson Road, Stephenson, Washington, NE37 3HW
  4. Dismissed22 December 20253370421
    3 Riversdale Terrace, Sunderland, SR2 7NQ
  5. Dismissed8 May 20253357788
    3 Holystone Close, Houghton Le Spring, Sunderland, DH4 5LE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.