Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 September 20213270529

Judds Farm Harrow Lane, Bulphan, UPMINSTER, Essex, RM14 3RE

extensions and alterations to existing dwelling

Authority
Thurrock Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Pannell G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • if the development is inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The disproportionate nature of the first floor extension compared to the original dwelling, combined with the substantial weight required to be given to Green Belt harm, meant that the fallback position and other material considerations did not clearly outweigh the harm and therefore very special circumstances did not exist.

The considerable weight given to the fallback position (prior approval for single storey rear extension) was outweighed by the substantial weight required to be given to the harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and limited harm to openness, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.

Framework references: 147, 148, 149

Plan policies cited: Policy PMD6

Judgments cited: Mansell v Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council [2017] EWCA Civ 1314

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.