Planning appeal decision
Land Within the Westhampnett / North East Chichester Sdl, North of Madgwick Lane, Chichester, PO18 0NR
Planning appeal 3270721 at Land Within the Westhampnett / North East Chichester Sdl, North of Madgwick Lane, Chichester, PO18 0NR (Chichester District Council) was allowed on 27 May 2022 by Inspector Woodwards O, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether or not the appeal site is an appropriate location for development of this type, particularly with regard to the wider masterplanning for the Westhampnett/North East Chichester Strategic Development Location (SDL), physical integration with the existing settlements of Chichester and Westhampnett, and reliance on the car by future occupiers.
for residential development comprising up-to 165 dwellings, including an element of affordable housing; together with an access from Madgwick Lane as well as a relocated agricultural access, also from Madgwick Lane; green infrastructure, including the enhancement of the Lavant Valley Linear Greenspace; sustainable drainage systems; and associated infrastructure
- Authority
- Chichester District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Woodwards O
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether or not the appeal site is an appropriate location for development of this type, particularly with regard to the wider masterplanning for the Westhampnett/North East Chichester Strategic Development Location (SDL), physical integration with the existing settlements of Chichester and Westhampnett, and reliance on the car by future occupiers
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, particularly with regard to the Lavant Valley landscape and visual integration with the existing settlements of Chichester and Westhampnett
- the effect of the proposed development on the special interest of the nearby listed buildings, in particular Old Place Farmhouse and Chichester cathedral, with regard to the effect on their settings
- whether or not the proposed development would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers, with particular regard to noise from the aerodrome and motor circuit
- whether or not the proposed development would create potential future risks to the operation of the aerodrome and/or motor racing circuit, including with regard to the efficient operation of the highway network in the vicinity of the appeal site with regard to events traffic related to major events at the motor racing circuit
What decided it
Under the tilted balance, the substantial benefits of housing delivery (including affordable housing) and other public benefits were not significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the moderate character/masterplanning harm and the limited heritage harm identified.
The substantial benefits of market and affordable housing, open space, biodiversity net gain and economic benefits outweighed the moderate harm to character/appearance and masterplanning conflict, and the lower end of less-than-substantial heritage harm, so that adverse impacts did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits under the tilted balance.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy 17Policy 7Policy 33Policy 47Policy 48Policy 40Policy AL4Policy CP17Criterion 1 of the IPSCriteria 5 of the IPS
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 71Paragraph 74Paragraph 81Paragraph 174Paragraph 176Paragraph 185Paragraph 187Paragraph 199Paragraph 202
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Chichester
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Allowed27 February 20263372880Land East Inlands Road and South of Railway Line, Inlands Road, Nutbourne, West Sussex, PO18 8RJ
- Allowed7 November 20253358691Chichester City Arts Centre, St. Bartholomews Church, Mount Lane, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 3DQ
- Dismissed16 June 20253357207Loxwood Garage, Loxwood Road, Alfold Bars, Loxwood, Billingshurst, West Sussex, RH14 0QS
- Dismissed2 October 20243330904Land South of 101 First Avenue, Batchmere, Chichester, PO20 7LQ
- Notice varied and upheld15 January 20243300531Land Northwest of Newbridge Farm, Salthill Road, Fishbourne, West Sussex, PO19 3PY
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®