Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 November 20213270978

243 London Road, MITCHAM, CR4 3NH

ground and first floor rear extensions to incorporate new one bed flat at first floor, and new storage area at ground floor

Authority
London Borough of Merton
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Bell-Williamson J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed extensions on the character and appearance of the host building and the surrounding area
  • whether the proposed flat would provide an adequate standard of accommodation for future occupiers, with regard to external amenity space, privacy and overall size
  • the effect on the living conditions of neighbouring residents, with regard to privacy, daylight and outlook
  • the effect on parking
  • whether the proposal makes adequate provision for waste and recycling collections

What decided it

The proposal breaches multiple development plan policies regarding character and appearance, standard of accommodation, living conditions of neighbours, and parking provision, with no material considerations to outweigh these conflicts.

No balancing exercise was undertaken; the proposal was found to be contrary to the development plan with no material considerations to outweigh the conflicts.

Plan policies cited: Policy DM D2, Policy DM D3, Policy CS 14, Policy D3 of The London Plan 2021, Policy D6. F(9) of The London Plan 2021, Policy D6. F(1) of The London Plan 2021, Policy DM T1, Policy T6. B of The London Plan 2021, Policy CS 20, Policy DM T3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.