Planning appeal decision
642 Mile End Road, LONDON, E3 4LH
described as, “Two storey extension of existing rear and reconfiguration of existing to provide two self-contained flats
- Authority
- London Borough of Tower Hamlets
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- O'Doherty A
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Tower Hamlets Cemetery Conservation Area
- the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with particular reference to daylight, sunlight, privacy, and outlook
- whether the proposal would provide adequate living conditions for future occupiers of the scheme, with particular reference to the provision of internal space, and the provision of private amenity space
- the effect of the proposal with respect to pedestrian safety and sustainable transport
What decided it
The combined planning harm identified across all four main issues—particularly the less than substantial but considerable harm to the conservation area and the unacceptable harm to neighbouring living conditions—was very significant and could not be outweighed by the moderate benefits of housing delivery and site intensification.
The moderate weight given to the benefits of providing two residential units, contributing to housing mix, and making use of an underused site did not outweigh the very significant combined harm to the conservation area, neighbouring living conditions, future occupier amenity, and sustainable transport provision.
Framework references: 16, 69, 120, 130
Plan policies cited: Policy D.DH2, Policy S.DH3, Policy D3, Policy HC1, Policy H2, Policy D.DH8, Policy D6, Policy D.H2, Policy D.H3, Policy D.MW3, Policy T5
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®