Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed19 November 20213271409

Old Bells Farm, Haughley, Stowmarket, IP14 3NP

Planning appeal 3271409 at Old Bells Farm, Haughley, Stowmarket, IP14 3NP (Mid Suffolk District Council) was dismissed on 19 November 2021 by Inspector Callister V, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would comply with development plan policy in respect of housing in the countryside.

the erection of a single dwelling

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Callister V
Postcode
IP14 3NP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would comply with development plan policy in respect of housing in the countryside
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether any policy conflict in relation to the above issues would be outweighed by other material considerations, such as to justify a decision other than in accordance with the development plan

What decided it

The proposal would result in an isolated dwelling in the countryside causing significant harm to rural character and appearance, with only limited benefits that do not outweigh the identified harm.

the limited benefits of a single dwelling and modest economic contribution do not outweigh the significant harm to rural character and appearance and conflict with locational policies

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
CS1CS2CS5H7H13H15
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 78Paragraph 79Paragraph 80Paragraph 174Paragraph 8Paragraph 9Paragraph 57
Judgments
Braintree DC v SSCLG, Greyread Ltd & Granville Developments Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 610

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

5 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Mid Suffolk District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed15 October 20266012038
    The Stables, Bobby Hill, Wattisfield, IP22 1NL
  2. Dismissed14 September 20266010281
    1 Nursery Cottages, Barham, Ipswich, IP6 0PR
  3. Dismissed8 September 20266010228
    Land East of 52 Exeter Road, Claydon, Ipswich, IP6 0BP
  4. Dismissed2 September 20263359620
    Keytons Pit Newton Road, Sudbury, CO10 0PY
  5. Quashed On Legal Grounds1 September 20263344278
    Walnut Meadown, Back Lane, Baylham, Ipswich, IP6 8LE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.