Planning appeal decision
Old Bells Farm, Haughley, Stowmarket, IP14 3NP
Planning appeal 3271409 at Old Bells Farm, Haughley, Stowmarket, IP14 3NP (Mid Suffolk District Council) was dismissed on 19 November 2021 by Inspector Callister V, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would comply with development plan policy in respect of housing in the countryside.
the erection of a single dwelling
- Authority
- Mid Suffolk District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Callister V
- Postcode
- IP14 3NP
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would comply with development plan policy in respect of housing in the countryside
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- whether any policy conflict in relation to the above issues would be outweighed by other material considerations, such as to justify a decision other than in accordance with the development plan
What decided it
The proposal would result in an isolated dwelling in the countryside causing significant harm to rural character and appearance, with only limited benefits that do not outweigh the identified harm.
the limited benefits of a single dwelling and modest economic contribution do not outweigh the significant harm to rural character and appearance and conflict with locational policies
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- CS1CS2CS5H7H13H15
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 78Paragraph 79Paragraph 80Paragraph 174Paragraph 8Paragraph 9Paragraph 57
- Judgments
- Braintree DC v SSCLG, Greyread Ltd & Granville Developments Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 610
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mid Suffolk District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed15 October 20266012038The Stables, Bobby Hill, Wattisfield, IP22 1NL
- Dismissed14 September 202660102811 Nursery Cottages, Barham, Ipswich, IP6 0PR
- Dismissed8 September 20266010228Land East of 52 Exeter Road, Claydon, Ipswich, IP6 0BP
- Dismissed2 September 20263359620Keytons Pit Newton Road, Sudbury, CO10 0PY
- Quashed On Legal Grounds1 September 20263344278Walnut Meadown, Back Lane, Baylham, Ipswich, IP6 8LE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®