Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed1 October 20213271571

Flat 2, 27 Castle Hill Avenue, FOLKESTONE, CT20 2QU

the replacement of current single glazed sash windows with uPVC double glazed casement windows

Authority
Folkestone and Hythe District Council
Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Rennie S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, together with the effect on the heritage significance of the Conservation Area

What decided it

The increased energy efficiency benefit of uPVC double glazing for a single flat does not outweigh the less than substantial harm to the character and appearance of the Conservation Area caused by replacing traditional timber sash windows with modern uPVC casement windows.

The less than substantial harm to the character and appearance of the Conservation Area was weighed against the relatively small public benefit of increased energy efficiency for a single flat, and the harm was found to outweigh the benefit.

Framework references: 199, 202

Plan policies cited: HB8, HE1, DSD

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.