Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed1 October 20213271571

Flat 2, 27 Castle Hill Avenue, Folkestone, CT20 2QU

Planning appeal 3271571 at Flat 2, 27 Castle Hill Avenue, Folkestone, CT20 2QU (Folkestone and Hythe District Council) was dismissed on 1 October 2021 by Inspector Rennie S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, together with the effect on the heritage significance of the Conservation Area.

the replacement of current single glazed sash windows with uPVC double glazed casement windows

Authority
Folkestone and Hythe District Council
Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Rennie S
Postcode
CT20 2QU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, together with the effect on the heritage significance of the Conservation Area

What decided it

The increased energy efficiency benefit of uPVC double glazing for a single flat does not outweigh the less than substantial harm to the character and appearance of the Conservation Area caused by replacing traditional timber sash windows with modern uPVC casement windows.

The less than substantial harm to the character and appearance of the Conservation Area was weighed against the relatively small public benefit of increased energy efficiency for a single flat, and the harm was found to outweigh the benefit.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
HB8HE1DSD
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 199Paragraph 202

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

122 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Folkestone and Hythe District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Allowed23 October 20266010522
    Atholl Cottage, Bartholomew Street, Hythe, CT21 5BS
  2. Dismissed19 October 20266014928
    130 Dolphins Road, Folkestone, CT19 5QB
  3. Dismissed30 September 20266007677
    Building Opposite Nash Cottage, Ashford Road, Brenzett, TN29 0BL
  4. Dismissed30 September 20266004364
    Opposite 67 Sandgate Road, Folkestone, CT20 1RY
  5. Dismissed30 September 20266004363
    Opposite 67 Sandgate Road, Folkestone, CT20 1RY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.