Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed27 September 20223271607

11 Pier Head , Wapping High Street , London , E1W 1PN

refurbishment & restoration works as previously approved: (PA/20/00459 & PA/20/00460) - Structural and other repairs to existing front and rear elevations; - Alterations and repairs to existing out-building; - Provision of single storey extension, which will connect the main house to the o utbuilding; - Minor internal alterations to all floors; - Replacement of all services. Plus: - Minor enlargement of a rear ground floor level window by lowering the sill 300mm (4 brick courses), addition of air conditioning unit to the previously approved extension and to create an opening to the extension at the rear”

Authority
London Borough of Tower Hamlets
Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Tweddle J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would preserve the special interest of the Grade II listed building, 11 Wapping High Street, and whether it would preserve or enhance the Wapping Pierhead Conservation Area
  • The effect of the development on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with regard to their privacy

What decided it

The proposal would fail to preserve the special interest of the listed building and the character and appearance of the conservation area, and would cause unacceptable harm to neighbouring privacy, with insufficient public benefits to justify the harm.

Framework references: 201, 202, 130

Plan policies cited: Policy S.DH1, Policy S.DH3, Policy D.DH8, Policy D3, Policy D4, Policy HC1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.