Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 October 20213271689

Bennetts Farm, Ashfield Road, Elmswell, Suffolk, IP30 9HJ

Planning appeal 3271689 at Bennetts Farm, Ashfield Road, Elmswell, Suffolk, IP30 9HJ (Mid Suffolk District Council) was dismissed on 6 October 2021 by Inspector Thompson P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including the setting of the Grade II listed building known as Dagwood Farmhouse.

demolition of existing structures and erection of one, part single storey and part two storey, dwelling house and cart lodge

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Thompson P
Postcode
IP30 9HJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including the setting of the Grade II listed building known as Dagwood Farmhouse

What decided it

The less than substantial harm to the setting of the Grade II listed building, to which great weight must be given under paragraph 199 of the Framework, was not outweighed by the public benefits of the proposal.

The less than substantial harm to the setting of Dagwood Farmhouse, to which great weight must be given, was not outweighed by the public benefits including housing delivery, removal of unsightly buildings, environmental and economic benefits, and highway safety improvements.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy HB1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 197Paragraph 199Paragraph 202Paragraph 206

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

14 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Mid Suffolk District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed15 October 20266012038
    The Stables, Bobby Hill, Wattisfield, IP22 1NL
  2. Dismissed14 September 20266010281
    1 Nursery Cottages, Barham, Ipswich, IP6 0PR
  3. Dismissed8 September 20266010228
    Land East of 52 Exeter Road, Claydon, Ipswich, IP6 0BP
  4. Dismissed2 September 20263359620
    Keytons Pit Newton Road, Sudbury, CO10 0PY
  5. Quashed On Legal Grounds1 September 20263344278
    Walnut Meadown, Back Lane, Baylham, Ipswich, IP6 8LE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.