Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed22 September 20213271800

New House Farm, Hatton Lane, Hatton, Warrington, WA4 4DA

demolition of existing equestrian buildings and the construction of 31 dwellings including affordable housing provision, associated parking, landscaping and infrastructure and creation of a new area of community open space

Authority
Warrington Borough Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Savage K

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to relevant development plan policies, the provisions of the Framework, the effect on the openness of the Green belt and the purposes of including land within it
  • Whether the proposal would represent an appropriate location for housing, having regard to the accessibility of the site to local services and facilities
  • If the proposal would be inappropriate development whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it

What decided it

The Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year supply of deliverable housing sites (3.4 years) engaged the presumption in favour of sustainable development under paragraph 11(d)(ii) of the Framework, and the significant benefits of housing delivery, particularly affordable housing provision, clearly outweighed any adverse impacts.

The benefits of housing delivery (31 dwellings including 9 affordable units) and support for rural services in neighbouring villages outweighed the limited increase in Green Belt openness impact, with no other material adverse impacts identified, applying paragraph 11(d)(ii) of the Framework given the Council's housing land supply shortfall

Framework references: 11, 57, 149

Plan policies cited: Policy CS1, Policy CS5, Policy MP1, Policy SN2, Policy QE5

Judgments cited: R (Lee Valley Regional Park Authority) v Broxbourne BC and Britannia Nurseries [2015] EWHC 185 (Admin)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.