Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld17 August 20213272031

26A High Street, BIGGLESWADE, SG18 0JL

Authority
Central Bedfordshire
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Other minor developments
Inspector
Harbottle M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the replacement windows and dormer cheeks and the removal of the chimney preserve, sustain and enhance the character or appearance of the Biggleswade Conservation Area
  • The effect of the replacement windows and dormer cheeks and the removal of the chimney on the significance of 29 Market Place as a heritage asset, including its setting

What decided it

The replacement windows and dormer cheeks in uPVC materials with inappropriate glazing patterns and the removal of the chimney caused less than substantial harm to the conservation area and listed building setting with no public benefits to outweigh this harm.

The less than substantial harm to the significance of the conservation area and the setting of the listed building was not outweighed by any identified public benefits, and great weight was attached to the conservation of heritage assets.

Framework references: 16

Plan policies cited: Policy HQ1, Policy HE3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.