Planning appeal decision
118 Wild Hill, SUTTON-IN-ASHFIELD, NG17 3JE
erection of one detached dwelling (in ‘outline’ with access only)
- Authority
- Ashfield District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Russell M
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the appeal site would be a suitable location for the proposed development, having regard to the development plan and national policy including the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
What decided it
The significant harm to the intrinsic character and beauty of the countryside through introduction of built form into a predominantly undeveloped rural frontage, combined with the unsustainable location, significantly and demonstrably outweighs the modest benefits of a single dwelling.
The modest benefits of housing delivery and economic benefits were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the significant harm to the intrinsic character and beauty of the countryside and the unsustainable location of the development.
Framework references: 11
Plan policies cited: Saved Policy ST4 (The Remainder of the District), Saved Policy EV2 (The Countryside)
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®