Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 August 20213272211

40 Church Walk, THAMES DITTON, KT7 0NW

loft conversion with rear dormer and side and front rooflight windows

Authority
Elmbridge Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Jones R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the rear dormer extension on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and the Thames Ditton Conservation Area

What decided it

The rear dormer extension causes harm to the character and appearance of the host dwelling and fails to preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the Thames Ditton Conservation Area, conflicting with the statutory duty under section 72(1) of the Planning (Listed Building and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 and relevant development plan policies.

Plan policies cited: Policy CS17 of the Elmbridge Core Strategy (2011), Policy DM2 of the Development Management Plan (2015), Policy DM12 of the Development Management Plan

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.