Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 September 20213272601

13, Canons Drive, Edgware, HA8 7RB

Planning appeal 3272601 at 13, Canons Drive, Edgware, HA8 7RB (London Borough of Harrow) was dismissed on 6 September 2021 by Inspector Troy D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including the Canon Park Conservation Area.

outbuilding at rear for use as store; extension and re- surfacing of driveway; installation of 0.900m high front boundary planter wall (demolition of front boundary wall (retrospective))

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Troy D
Postcode
HA8 7RB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including the Canon Park Conservation Area

What decided it

The scale, siting and design of the proposed boundary wall and driveway works would result in an incongruous and out-of-keeping addition that would adversely harm the character and appearance of the conservation area, with insufficient public benefit to offset this less-than-substantial harm.

The less-than-substantial harm to the character and appearance of the conservation area and its setting was weighed against the private benefits to the appellant's family accessibility needs and the scheme's design quality, with the harm outweighing the benefits.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D1Policy HC1Core Policy CS1.BCore Policy CS1.DPolicy DM1Policy DM7
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 202Paragraph 126Paragraph 130Paragraph 197

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

536 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Harrow

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266006380
    Thrale Farm, 1 Oxhey Lane, Pinner, HA3 6SX
  2. Dismissed22 October 20266013962
    2 Whitefriars Avenue,, Harrow Weald, HA3 5RN
  3. Dismissed19 October 20266011336
    52 Durley Avenue, Pinner, HA5 1JH
  4. Dismissed16 October 20266011223
    30 Kenmore Avenue, Kenton, HA3 8PQ
  5. Dismissed16 October 20266008284
    24 Uxbridge Road, Stanmore, Harrow, HA7 3LG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.