Planning appeal decision
land at Hayesden Lane, Tonbridge, KENT, TN11 9AX
an outline application for one residential dwelling
- Authority
- Tunbridge Wells Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Glassar S
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
- the effect of that development on the openness of the Green Belt
- whether or not the appeal site is an acceptable location for the development proposed, with specific regard to access to facilities
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- whether or not the proposed development would affect highway safety, with specific regard to the access arrangements
- would harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, be clearly outweighed by other considerations, and if so would this amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal represents inappropriate development in the Green Belt which would cause substantial harm to openness and character, and this harm is not clearly outweighed by the limited benefits of housing delivery and economic benefit during construction.
The harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, combined with harm to openness, character and appearance, and highway safety concerns, was not clearly outweighed by the limited weight attributable to housing supply benefits and construction-phase economic benefit, such that very special circumstances do not exist.
Framework references: 149, 148, 137, 130, 111, 11
Plan policies cited: Policy MGB1, Policy CS2, Policy LBD1, Policies 4, 5, 6 and 14, Policy EN1, Policy EN25, Policy TP4
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®