Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed8 November 20213272921

Land west of Wickham Lane, Cotton, Stowmarket, Suffolk, IP14 4QP

erection of detached eco dwelling

Authority
Mid Suffolk District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Callister V

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the appeal site is suitable for the development proposed, having regard to local and national policies concerned with the location of new development and the effect on the character and appearance of the local area

What decided it

The proposal would introduce an isolated residential development in the countryside contrary to Paragraph 80 of the Framework, and the modest benefits do not outweigh the harmful impact when assessed against the policies in the Framework taken as a whole.

The harmful impact of the development would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits when assessed against the policies in the Framework taken as a whole, and the presumption in favour of sustainable development does not apply.

Framework references: 11, 78, 79, 80, 130, 8, 9

Plan policies cited: Policy CS1, Policy CS2, Policy CS5, Policy H7, Policy GP1, Policy H15, emerging Policy LP01

Judgments cited: Braintree DC v SSCLG, Greyread Ltd & Granville Developments Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 610

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.