Planning appeal decision
Land west of Wickham Lane, Cotton, Stowmarket, Suffolk, IP14 4QP
erection of detached eco dwelling
- Authority
- Mid Suffolk District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Callister V
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the appeal site is suitable for the development proposed, having regard to local and national policies concerned with the location of new development and the effect on the character and appearance of the local area
What decided it
The proposal would introduce an isolated residential development in the countryside contrary to Paragraph 80 of the Framework, and the modest benefits do not outweigh the harmful impact when assessed against the policies in the Framework taken as a whole.
The harmful impact of the development would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits when assessed against the policies in the Framework taken as a whole, and the presumption in favour of sustainable development does not apply.
Framework references: 11, 78, 79, 80, 130, 8, 9
Plan policies cited: Policy CS1, Policy CS2, Policy CS5, Policy H7, Policy GP1, Policy H15, emerging Policy LP01
Judgments cited: Braintree DC v SSCLG, Greyread Ltd & Granville Developments Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 610
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®