Planning appeal decision
Land East and South of Ovington House, Ovington, Prudhoe, Northumberland
Planning appeal 3272984 at Land East and South of Ovington House, Ovington, Prudhoe, Northumberland (Northumberland County Council) was dismissed on 29 September 2021 by Inspector Chukwujekwu I, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to development plan policies and the Framework, including the effect on openness.
construction of replacement dwelling
- Authority
- Northumberland County Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Chukwujekwu I
- Postcode
- NE42 6DH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to development plan policies and the Framework, including the effect on openness
- the effect of the proposed development on the purposes of the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposed development on the significance of Ovington House and the Ovington Conservation Area
- if the development is inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, and if so whether this amounts to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposed development
What decided it
The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt which is harmful by definition, combined with substantial harm to openness and Green Belt purposes, and considerable harm to the significance of the conservation area and non-designated heritage asset, which together are not outweighed by the limited public benefits.
The substantial harm to the Green Belt and openness, the harm to Green Belt purposes, and the considerable harm to heritage significance were not outweighed by the limited public benefits of housing supply, sustainable design features, and effective use of previously developed land.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy NE7Policy NE8Policy BE1Policy BE18Policy H32Policy GD2Policy LR11Policy LR15Policy GD6
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 149Paragraph 150
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Northumberland County Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed28 October 20266011490Land North West of Ivy Cottage, Whittonstall, DH8 9JN
- Dismissed16 October 2026601049113 Park Drive, Hepscott Park, Morpeth, NE61 6QA
- Dismissed13 October 20266009232Land East of Monks Lodge, Mitford, NE61 2YJ
- Dismissed29 September 202660126272 Dilston West Cottages, Corbridge, NE45 5RL
- Allowed9 September 20266007219Breckon Hill, Lowgate, Hexham, NE46 2NL
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®