Planning appeal decision
13 Park Drive, Hepscott Park, Morpeth, NE61 6QA
Planning appeal 6010491 at 13 Park Drive, Hepscott Park, Morpeth, NE61 6QA (Northumberland County Council) was dismissed on 16 October 2026, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the site provides a suitable location for the development, having particular regard to the development plan's spatial strategy.
an independent living bungalow within curtilage
- Authority
- Northumberland County Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Postcode
- NE61 6QA
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the site provides a suitable location for the development, having particular regard to the development plan's spatial strategy
- The effect of the development on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
- The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
- Whether appropriate living conditions would be provided for the future occupiers of the development, with particular reference to their access to private outside space and their privacy, and the effect of the development on the living conditions of the occupiers of No. 13 Park Drive (No. 13), with particular reference to their outlook and privacy
- The effect of the development on the living conditions of the occupiers of No. 14 Park Drive (No. 14), with particular reference to their outlook
- Whether the development validly qualifies as an exemption from the mandatory BNG and, if not, the implications of this
- Whether other considerations clearly outweigh the harm to the Green Belt and any other harm so as to amount to very special circumstances
What decided it
The cumulative Green Belt harm, BNG non-compliance, and other identified harms were not clearly outweighed by the personal circumstances and other considerations, so the very special circumstances necessary to justify inappropriate development in the Green Belt did not exist.
The personal circumstances of the intended occupant and the benefits of specialist housing, tempered by unresolved questions over alternatives, did not clearly outweigh the harm to the Green Belt and the other planning harms identified, so very special circumstances did not exist.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- STP 1STP 1(g)STP 1(h)STP 7STP 8STP 2STP 5QOP 1QOP 2HOU 5HOU 7HOU 8HOU 9HOU 11policy 10
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Policy DP3Policy N2Policy GB6Policy HO7
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Northumberland County Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed28 October 20266011490Land North West of Ivy Cottage, Whittonstall, DH8 9JN
- Dismissed13 October 20266009232Land East of Monks Lodge, Mitford, NE61 2YJ
- Dismissed29 September 202660126272 Dilston West Cottages, Corbridge, NE45 5RL
- Allowed9 September 20266007219Breckon Hill, Lowgate, Hexham, NE46 2NL
- Dismissed10 July 20266006998Houghton Moor, Heddon-on-the-wall, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE15 0EZ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®