Planning appeal decision
2 Dilston West Cottages, Corbridge, NE45 5RL
Planning appeal 6012627 at 2 Dilston West Cottages, Corbridge, NE45 5RL (Northumberland County Council) was dismissed on 29 September 2026, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
rear extension, internal alterations, stairwell extension, raised decking and veranda, two additional rooflights and 8 solar panels (as amended 23/3/26)
- Authority
- Northumberland County Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Postcode
- NE45 5RL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the site and surrounding area
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposed development constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt by reason of disproportionate increase in size, and the harm to openness and character and appearance is not clearly outweighed by other considerations, so very special circumstances do not exist.
The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness, together with unacceptable harm to character and appearance, was not clearly outweighed by the appellant's personal benefits of extending the home and improving energy efficiency, so very special circumstances do not exist.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy STP 1Policy STP 7Policy STP 8Policy QOP 1Policy QOP 2
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Northumberland County Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed28 October 20266011490Land North West of Ivy Cottage, Whittonstall, DH8 9JN
- Dismissed16 October 2026601049113 Park Drive, Hepscott Park, Morpeth, NE61 6QA
- Dismissed13 October 20266009232Land East of Monks Lodge, Mitford, NE61 2YJ
- Allowed9 September 20266007219Breckon Hill, Lowgate, Hexham, NE46 2NL
- Dismissed10 July 20266006998Houghton Moor, Heddon-on-the-wall, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE15 0EZ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®