®Planning appeal decision
59 Elm Avenue, RUISLIP, HA4 8PE
the demolition of existing dwelling and erection of residential building housing 6 flats with associated bin and cycle provision. Removal of corner drop kerb and creation of new drop kerb and widening of front drop kerb
- Authority
- London Borough of Hillingdon
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Wilde J
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether or not the proposed development would result in an unacceptable loss of family housing
- The effect of the proposed development on highway safety and on the character and appearance of the area
What decided it
The conflict with policies DMH 2 and H10 regarding the loss of family housing and failure to provide the housing mix required by robust local evidence of need outweighed the absence of harm to highway safety and character and appearance.
The conflict with housing mix policy and the significant demonstrated need for family housing outweighed the non-conflict with character and appearance and highway safety policies.
Plan policies cited: Policy DMH 2, Policy H10, Policy DMT 2, Policy DMHB 11, Policy DMHD 1, Policy BE1
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.