Planning appeal decision
Slackfields Farm Slackfields Lane, Wharncliffe Side, Sheffield, S35 0DU
Planning appeal 3273084 at Slackfields Farm Slackfields Lane, Wharncliffe Side, Sheffield, S35 0DU (Sheffield City Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 18 February 2022 by Inspector Harbottle M, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether it is inappropriate development in the Green Belt (‘the GB’).
the erection of a dwellinghouse and associated outbuilding (together “the unauthorised development”)
- Authority
- Sheffield City Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Harbottle M
- Postcode
- S35 0DU
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether it is inappropriate development in the Green Belt (‘the GB’)
- Its effect on the openness and purposes of including land in the GB
- Whether it is consistent with locational policies of the development plan, including whether those policies are consistent with the National Planning Policy Framework (‘the Framework’)
- Its effect on landscape character
- If it is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The harm to the openness and purposes of the Green Belt from the inappropriate, unauthorised dwellinghouse was not clearly outweighed by the other considerations advanced, so very special circumstances did not exist.
The substantial harm to Green Belt openness was weighed against the significant weight given to the human rights of the appellants and their dependent granddaughter and the limited weight given to other considerations (planning history, fallback storage use, housing supply, affordable housing, self-build, Council conduct), and the harm was not clearly outweighed, so the balance tipped against the appeal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS71 (Sheffield Core Strategy)saved policy GE1 (Sheffield UDP)saved policy GE3 (Sheffield UDP)saved policy GE5 (Sheffield UDP)policy CS41 (Sheffield Core Strategy)
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 149Paragraph 138
- Judgments
- Singh v SSCLG & Sandwell BC [2010] EWHC 1621 (Admin); [2011] JPL 777
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Sheffield City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Notice varied and upheld17 September 20263378304Step Rehabilitation, 30 Troutbeck Road, Sheffield, S7 2QA
- Notice varied and upheld7 September 20263376754Land at the Junction of Spital Street, Sorby Street, And Carlisle Street,, Sheffield, S4 7LJ
- Notice varied and upheld7 September 20263374622Land At Rear Of 551-561 Attercliffe Road, Kimberley Street, Sheffield, S9 3RA
- Split Decision23 July 20263377264Samehill Farm and Land to East , Hagg Lane, Sheffield, S10 5PX
- Allowed21 July 20266004273Site Of Former 27 Skew Hill, Sheffield, S35 8QW
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®