Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 August 20213273139

Trystings, Hamm Court, Addlestone, KT13 8YB

Planning appeal 3273139 at Trystings, Hamm Court, Addlestone, KT13 8YB (Runnymede Borough Council) was dismissed on 5 August 2021 by Inspector O'Doherty A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the Framework and development plan policy.

described as, “Additional first floor extension, to the rear additional fenestration

Authority
Runnymede Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
O'Doherty A
Postcode
KT13 8YB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the Framework and development plan policy
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • if the proposal would be inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt causing substantial harm to openness and character, which is not clearly outweighed by other considerations, so very special circumstances do not exist.

The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness, together with harm to character and appearance, was not clearly outweighed by the limited other considerations (neutral neighbour impact, private accommodation benefit, and flood refuge provision), so the balance did not justify the proposal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy EE14Policy EE1Policy EE13
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 149Paragraph 148Paragraph 130Paragraph 14

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

143 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Runnymede Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266006748
    St Merryns Copse, Chobham Road, Ottershaw, KT16 0QE
  2. Dismissed17 August 20266008286
    203 Almners Road, Lyne, KT16 0BL
  3. Notice varied and upheld13 July 20263377703
    Land Adjacent to Warren Farm, Green Road, Thorpe, Surrey, TW20 8QT
  4. Dismissed5 May 20263376337
    Webbs The Green, Englefield Green, Egham, TW20 0YX
  5. Dismissed3 March 20266002481
    7 Ottershaw Park, Ottershaw, KT16 0QG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.