Planning appeal decision
Land Adjoining 7 Underwood Close, Canterbury, CT4 7BS
Planning appeal 3273298 at Land Adjoining 7 Underwood Close, Canterbury, CT4 7BS (Canterbury City Council) was dismissed on 1 October 2021 by Inspector Kemmann-Lane T, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the site is suitable for a single dwelling in advance of a proposal for the comprehensive development of the wider area.
a detached dwelling including access and layout with associated parking and replacement garage
- Authority
- Canterbury City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Kemmann-Lane T
- Postcode
- CT4 7BS
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the site is suitable for a single dwelling in advance of a proposal for the comprehensive development of the wider area
- Whether the parking and access arrangement proposed would have an unacceptable noise and disturbance impact on the living conditions of the occupiers of No.4 Underwood Close
- The adequacy of the parking and turning arrangements
- The need for mitigation in relation to the Stodmarsh Nature reserve
What decided it
The unresolved issue of mitigation in relation to the Stodmarsh Nature Reserve and the lack of assurance that the development would be nutrient neutral, which would be detrimental to the ecological importance of the Special Protection Area.
The benefits of a single dwelling and the resolution of the noise and disturbance concerns would have outweighed the conflict with policy SP3, but the unresolved ecological mitigation issue prevented permission being granted.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SP3Policy DBE3Policy DBE1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 127
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Canterbury City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Allowed26 March 20263374468The Orchard Marley Lane, Kingston, Kent, CT4 6JH
- Allowed5 March 20263374628Assemble Spaces, Albert Hall Albert Street, Whitstable, CT5 1HT
- Allowed26 February 20263373183Land off The Hill, Littlebourne, CT3 1UX
- Dismissed22 May 20253358230143 Faversham Road, Seasalter, Kent, CT5 4SD
- Dismissed21 May 2025335911713 Gordon Road, Herne Bay, CT6 5QX
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®