Planning appeal decision
3 Nunnery Way, Clifford, Wetherby, West Yorkshire, LS23 6SL
Planning appeal 3273515 at 3 Nunnery Way, Clifford, Wetherby, West Yorkshire, LS23 6SL (Leeds City Council) was dismissed on 1 September 2021 by Inspector Cross D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt.
change of use including a new boundary fence to enlarge a domestic garden
- Authority
- Leeds City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Cross D
- Postcode
- LS23 6SL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
- The effect on the character and appearance of the area, with due regard to the Clifford Conservation Area
- The effect on Local Green Space
- The effect on biodiversity and protected trees
- Would any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The substantial weight to be given to Green Belt harm as inappropriate development, combined with significant harm to character and appearance and failure to demonstrate very special circumstances, was not outweighed by any material considerations.
The substantial weight given to Green Belt harm from inappropriate development and the significant harm to character and appearance were not clearly outweighed by other considerations, and no very special circumstances were demonstrated to justify the proposal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy GS-1 of the Clifford Neighbourhood Plan 2016-31Policy SP13 of the Core StrategyPolicy G1 of the Core StrategyPolicy G9 of the Core StrategyPolicy P12 of the Core StrategyPolicy Land 2 of the Natural Resources and Waste Publication Document 2010Policy G6 of the Core StrategyPolicy P10 of the Core StrategyPolicy P11 of the Core StrategyPolicy N33 of the Unitary Development Plan Review 2006Policy GB25 of the Unitary Development Plan Review 2006Policy GP5 of the Unitary Development Plan Review 2006Policy GB4 of the Unitary Development Plan Review 2006Policy HDG3 of the Householder Design Guide 2012
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 150
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Leeds City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Allowed13 October 20266011132Rei House Stables, Ripley Lane, Guiseley, LS20 9NY
- Dismissed12 October 20266011503Craven Bank, Harewood Road, Leeds, LS17 9HL
- Dismissed27 August 20266009680The Bradford Golf Club, Hawksworth Lane, Guiseley, LS208NP
- Allowed12 August 20266005793Breary Grange Farm, Kings Road, Leeds, LS16 9JN
- Dismissed24 July 20266006233Uplands Cottage, Back Lane, Leeds, LS12 5HL
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®