Planning appeal decision
Uplands Cottage, Back Lane, Leeds, LS12 5HL
Planning appeal 6006233 at Uplands Cottage, Back Lane, Leeds, LS12 5HL (Leeds City Council) was dismissed on 24 July 2026 by Inspector H Jones, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal to vary condition 5 would result in a development which amounts to inappropriate development in the Green Belt.
gable roof extension to rear; first floor rear extension incorporating a balcony and balustrade to rear; removal of ground floor window and repositioning of entrance door to front; new window at ground floor to front; removal of dormers and replacement wit h new three new dormers; raised decking area rear; new gate to side of dwelling; removal of ground floor side window and replacement with a new entrance and door; infill of existing entrance door to rear; replace two ground floor rear windows with new windows; replacement of ground floor rear window with bi folding doors without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref 24/04127/FU, dated 16 September 2024
- Authority
- Leeds City Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- H Jones
- Postcode
- LS12 5HL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal to vary condition 5 would result in a development which amounts to inappropriate development in the Green Belt
- The effect that the proposal to vary condition 5 would have on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal would result in inappropriate development in the Green Belt by permitting disproportionate cumulative extensions exceeding the 30% volumetric threshold, and the personal circumstances of the appellant's relative, while engaged with human rights and equality law, do not clearly outweigh this substantial Green Belt harm.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy N33Householder Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 154
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Leeds City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed13 October 20266011132Rei House Stables, Ripley Lane, Guiseley, LS20 9NY
- Dismissed12 October 20266011503Craven Bank, Harewood Road, Leeds, LS17 9HL
- Dismissed27 August 20266009680The Bradford Golf Club, Hawksworth Lane, Guiseley, LS208NP
- Allowed12 August 20266005793Breary Grange Farm, Kings Road, Leeds, LS16 9JN
- Dismissed15 July 20266006571Think Like A Pony, Otley Old Road, Bramhope, Leeds, LS18 5HZ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®