Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed27 August 20266009680

The Bradford Golf Club, Hawksworth Lane, Guiseley, LS208NP

Planning appeal 6009680 at The Bradford Golf Club, Hawksworth Lane, Guiseley, LS208NP (Leeds City Council) was dismissed on 27 August 2026 by Inspector Ryan Cowley, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effects of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including the setting of the Tranmere Park Conservation Area and protected trees.

Provision of sports netting system with associated works

Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
leisure-sport
Inspector
Ryan Cowley
Postcode
LS20 8NP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effects of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including the setting of the Tranmere Park Conservation Area and protected trees
  • the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring properties
  • ecology and nature conservation

What decided it

The moderate harm to the conservation area's significance, combined with harm to protected trees, living conditions of neighbours, and ecology, substantially outweighed the limited public benefits of the proposal.

The moderate harm to the conservation area's significance, harm to protected trees, harm to living conditions of neighbours, and harm to ecology and nature conservation were weighed against the limited public benefits of protecting neighbouring properties and associated structures; the harms were not overcome by the benefits.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy P10Policy P11Policy P12Policy G9saved policy GP5saved policy N19saved policy BD5policy Land 2
National Planning Policy Framework
Policy HE6Policy GB7

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

51 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Leeds City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed13 October 20266011132
    Rei House Stables, Ripley Lane, Guiseley, LS20 9NY
  2. Dismissed12 October 20266011503
    Craven Bank, Harewood Road, Leeds, LS17 9HL
  3. Allowed12 August 20266005793
    Breary Grange Farm, Kings Road, Leeds, LS16 9JN
  4. Dismissed24 July 20266006233
    Uplands Cottage, Back Lane, Leeds, LS12 5HL
  5. Dismissed15 July 20266006571
    Think Like A Pony, Otley Old Road, Bramhope, Leeds, LS18 5HZ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.