Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 December 20213273542

Hill House, Norwich Road, Wetheringsett Cum Brockford, Stowmarket, Suffolk , IP14 5NS

Planning appeal 3273542 at Hill House, Norwich Road, Wetheringsett Cum Brockford, Stowmarket, Suffolk , IP14 5NS (Mid Suffolk District Council) was dismissed on 17 December 2021 by Inspector Price J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be appropriate in respect of development plan policy for the location of housing.

erection of 2no dwellings

Authority
Mid Suffolk District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Price J
Postcode
IP14 5NS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be appropriate in respect of development plan policy for the location of housing
  • whether the proposal would be appropriate in respect of the character and appearance of the area, including the setting of the adjacent grade II listed Turnpike cottages

What decided it

The less than substantial harm to the setting of the grade II listed Turnpike cottages, when weighed against the small public benefits of the scheme under Framework paragraph 202, clearly outweighs those benefits and engages paragraph 11 d i) as a clear reason for refusal.

The small public benefits of two dwellings making only a minimal contribution to housing supply and very small economic benefits are clearly outweighed by the less than substantial harm to the setting of the listed Turnpike cottages, which tips the balance against the proposal despite the out-of-date development plan policies.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
CS1CS2CS5CSFR FC1CSFR FC1.1LP Policy H7LP Policy H10LP Policy GP1LP Policy H13LP Policy H15LP Policy HB1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 199Paragraph 202

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

36 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Mid Suffolk District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed15 October 20266012038
    The Stables, Bobby Hill, Wattisfield, IP22 1NL
  2. Dismissed14 September 20266010281
    1 Nursery Cottages, Barham, Ipswich, IP6 0PR
  3. Dismissed8 September 20266010228
    Land East of 52 Exeter Road, Claydon, Ipswich, IP6 0BP
  4. Dismissed2 September 20263359620
    Keytons Pit Newton Road, Sudbury, CO10 0PY
  5. Quashed On Legal Grounds1 September 20263344278
    Walnut Meadown, Back Lane, Baylham, Ipswich, IP6 8LE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.