Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 September 20213273572

Woodlands Cross Lane, Croft, WARRINGTON, WA3 7AR

the erection of a detached dwelling

Authority
Warrington Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Hitchcock R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development within the Green Belt for the purposes of the Framework and the relevant development plan policy
  • if the development is inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The site lies outside the village settlement boundary and has insufficient information to demonstrate that the proposal would not have a greater impact on Green Belt openness than existing development, such that it cannot qualify for the exceptions to inappropriate development in the Green Belt.

The harm to Green Belt openness and permanence, to which substantial weight must be attached, was not clearly outweighed by the moderate economic benefits of the proposal.

Framework references: 149, 145

Plan policies cited: Policy CS5

Judgments cited: Julian Wood v The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, Gravesham Borough Council [2015] EWCA Civ 195; Euro Garages Ltd v SSCLG & Anor [2018] EWHC 1753 (Admin)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.