Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 November 20213273816

128 Camden Road , London , NW1 9EE

erection of a two storey upward extension to form new residential unit (1x3bed) and alterations to shopfront and installation of front entrance door to residential unit

Authority
London Borough of Camden
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Savage K

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the heritage significance of the Camden Broadway Conservation Area
  • Whether it is necessary for the development to be car-free
  • Whether it is necessary for contributions to be paid in respect of affordable housing and to mitigate the effects of construction on the highway and living conditions of nearby residents, and if so, whether there are appropriate mechanisms in place to secure such contributions

What decided it

The less than substantial harm to the heritage significance of the designated conservation area, to which great weight must be given, was not outweighed by the limited public benefits of the proposal, and the absence of necessary planning obligations for car-free restrictions, affordable housing, and construction management created additional conflicts with the development plan.

The less than substantial harm to the significance of the designated heritage asset, to which great weight must be given, was not outweighed by the limited public benefits of providing an additional dwelling, local patronage, and removal of graffiti.

Framework references: 202, 55

Plan policies cited: Policy D1, Policy D2, Policy T1, Policy T2, Policy H4, Policy A1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.