Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 January 20223273906

140 Arden Crescent, Dagenham, ESSEX, RM9 4SA

conversion of existing dwelling house into two 1 x bedroom flats

Authority
London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Cross D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the supply of family housing
  • The living conditions of future residents with regards to amenity space

What decided it

The proposal would cause significant harm to the supply of family housing and would not provide suitable amenity space for residents of Flat 1, and these adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited benefits of the proposal.

The adverse impacts of the development, comprising loss of family housing and inadequate amenity space, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the identified benefits of adding to the mix and supply of dwellings, such that the proposal would not represent sustainable development.

Framework references: 11

Plan policies cited: Policy BC4 of the Borough Wide Development Policies Document 2011, Policy GG4 of the London Plan, Policy BP5 of the Borough Wide Development Policies Document 2011, Policy D6 of the London Plan, Policy CM1 of the Council's Core Strategy 2010, Policy CM2 of the Council's Core Strategy 2010, Policy BP10 of the Borough Wide Development Policies Document 2011

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.