Planning appeal decision
13 Crown Corner, Framlingham Road, Brundish, Woodbridge , IP13 8BD
Planning appeal 3273922 at 13 Crown Corner, Framlingham Road, Brundish, Woodbridge , IP13 8BD (Mid Suffolk District Council) was dismissed on 11 April 2022 by Inspector Tudhope S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be an appropriate form of development in this location, with particular regard to whether it would provide satisfactory access to services and facilities and its effect on the character and appearance of the area.
Outline Erection of 1 no. dwelling (with access)
- Authority
- Mid Suffolk District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Tudhope S
- Postcode
- IP13 8BD
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be an appropriate form of development in this location, with particular regard to whether it would provide satisfactory access to services and facilities and its effect on the character and appearance of the area
- whether or not a safe means of access can be provided
What decided it
The proposal would result in future occupants being highly reliant on private motorised transport to access services and facilities, creating a conflict with the Framework's objectives to promote sustainable transport solutions and manage patterns of growth accordingly, which adverse impact significantly and demonstrably outweighs the limited benefits.
The adverse impacts of unsustainable location and reliance on private motorised transport significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited economic and social benefits of one dwelling and modest benefits of work-from-home enablement and renewable energy potential, when assessed against the Framework policies as a whole.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS1Policy CS2Policy FC1Policy FC1.1Policy CS5Policy GP1Policy H15Policy T10
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 8Paragraph 79Paragraph 105Paragraph 112Paragraph 11Paragraph 104
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mid Suffolk District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed15 October 20266012038The Stables, Bobby Hill, Wattisfield, IP22 1NL
- Dismissed14 September 202660102811 Nursery Cottages, Barham, Ipswich, IP6 0PR
- Dismissed8 September 20266010228Land East of 52 Exeter Road, Claydon, Ipswich, IP6 0BP
- Dismissed2 September 20263359620Keytons Pit Newton Road, Sudbury, CO10 0PY
- Quashed On Legal Grounds1 September 20263344278Walnut Meadown, Back Lane, Baylham, Ipswich, IP6 8LE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®