Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed6 September 20213273927

32 Cedars Drive, UXBRIDGE, UB10 0JU

the erection of a single storey side and double storey rear extension

Authority
London Borough of Hillingdon
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Barnes D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of host property and the surrounding area

What decided it

The proposed extension would be modest, subordinate in design and scale to the host property, and would not cause unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the property or streetscene, particularly given the precedent of similar permissions at neighbouring properties.

Plan policies cited: Policy DMHD 1, Policy BE1, Policy DMHB 11

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.