Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 September 20213274049

Wheaton Hill Stables, Silver Street , Stevington, MK43 7ER

Planning appeal 3274049 at Wheaton Hill Stables, Silver Street , Stevington, MK43 7ER (Bedford Borough Council) was dismissed on 7 September 2021 by Inspector Chalk M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would be in an appropriate location, having regard to the aims and objectives of local and national planning policies.

change of use of land and buildings for a temporary period of 3 years to form commercial stables/livery, construction of new stables and siting of temporary home for a period of 3 years

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
agricultural · Change of use
Inspector
Chalk M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would be in an appropriate location, having regard to the aims and objectives of local and national planning policies
  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The absence of proven necessity for a permanent residential presence on site and lack of evidence that alternative accommodation or remote monitoring had been investigated meant the proposal failed to meet Policy 68 criteria for rural workers' dwellings.

The creation of one temporary dwelling and benefits to the appellant's business did not outweigh the harm of locating residential development in an inappropriate location outside the settlement boundary contrary to local plan policies.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 68Policy 3SPolicy 4SPolicy 7SPolicy 28SPolicy 29Policy 30Policy 37

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

12 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Bedford Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed19 October 20266011784
    1 Wood Road, Harrold, Bedford, MK43 7BS
  2. Dismissed16 October 20266013304
    11 Earls Holme, Bedford, MK42 8PG
  3. Allowed15 October 20266011978
    26 Becher Close, Renhold, MK41 0LP
  4. Allowed23 September 20263364376
    44 Portway , Great Denham , Bedford , MK40 4GB
  5. Allowed21 September 20263373400
    14 Woodman Way, Wootton, Bedford, MK43 9RX

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.