Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 November 20213274200

Global Infusion Court, Preston Hill, CHESHAM, HP5 3FE

Demolition of existing buildings and the erection of 63 no. dwellings comprising 13 no. 3 bedroom houses and 50 no. 1 and 2 bedroom apartments, associated car parking, open space, landscaping and ancillary works

Authority
Buckinghamshire Council - Chiltern Area *
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Sherratt C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development on the availability of employment land and floorspace
  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the development on the living conditions of the future occupiers of the development by reason of outlook and the provision of outdoor public and private amenity space

What decided it

Even under the tilted balance, the harm to the character and appearance of the area and to the living conditions of future occupiers (inadequate public and private amenity space and an intrusive acoustic fence) was found to significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of the scheme.

the significant/substantial benefits of housing and affordable housing delivery, brownfield reuse and other factors were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the harm to living conditions of future occupiers and to the character and appearance of the area, even applying the tilted balance

Framework references: 130, 134

Plan policies cited: Policy GC1, Policy GC2, Policy GC3, Policy GC4, Policy H3, Policy H12, Policy E1, Policy E2, Policy E3, Policy E4, Policy CS1, Policy CS3, Policy CS5, Policy CS16, Policy CS20, Policy CS30, Policy DM EP3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.